| oldid |
date/time |
username |
edit summary
|
| 1839154 |
2010-06-11T03:04:53Z |
Adrignola |
importance -> priority
|
| 1839150 |
2010-06-11T03:00:04Z |
Adrignola |
moved [[Template:Importance]] to [[Template:Priority]]: More accurate naming.
|
| 1833594 |
2010-06-08T20:18:25Z |
Adrignola |
Protected "[[Template:Importance]]": Uses complex features of wiki syntax ([edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) [move=autoconfirmed] (indefinite))
|
| 1833593 |
2010-06-08T20:18:08Z |
Adrignola |
fixed code
|
| 1833592 |
2010-06-08T20:14:53Z |
Adrignola |
cleanup
|
| 1833511 |
2010-06-08T20:02:21Z |
Adrignola |
18 revisions from [[:w:Template:Importance]]: dependency
|
| 1833510 |
2010-05-26T10:23:04Z |
Joy (usurped) |
moved [[Template:Importance/temp]] to [[Template:Importance]]: moved the re-purposed template back in place
|
| 1833509 |
2010-05-26T10:16:28Z |
Joy (usurped) |
moved [[Template:Importance]] to [[Template:Importance/temp]]: in process of salvaging old history, per [[Template talk:Importance#Re-purpose]]
|
| 1833508 |
2009-09-03T07:58:25Z |
MSGJ |
moved [[Template:Impor]] to [[Template:Importance]]: clearer name
|
| 1833507 |
2009-05-06T22:22:58Z |
MSGJ |
no, put it on both sides
|
| 1833506 |
2009-05-06T22:22:06Z |
MSGJ |
nbsp not needed now
|
| 1833505 |
2009-05-06T22:15:34Z |
MSGJ |
remove importance icon - unnecessary and unused
|
| 1833504 |
2009-05-06T22:10:48Z |
MSGJ |
protection template
|
| 1833503 |
2009-05-06T22:09:32Z |
MSGJ |
Protected Template:Impor: [[WP:HRT|Highly visible template]] ([edit=sysop] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))
|
| 1833502 |
2009-05-02T07:58:15Z |
WOSlinker |
add impn option
|
| 1833501 |
2009-04-11T02:25:16Z |
PC78 |
|
| 1833500 |
2009-04-11T02:22:43Z |
PC78 |
don't want icons do display by default
|
| 1833499 |
2009-04-09T13:50:46Z |
WOSlinker |
class is import rather than importance
|
| 1833498 |
2009-04-09T12:47:47Z |
MSGJ |
simplify
|
| 1833497 |
2009-04-09T11:31:28Z |
Happy-melon |
fix
|
| 1833496 |
2009-04-09T11:30:44Z |
Happy-melon |
lol someone did find-and-replace "class"→"importance", didn't they? Also SL-importance is not used AFAIK
|
| 1833495 |
2009-04-09T11:26:40Z |
Happy-melon |
expand redirect
|
| 1833494 |
2009-04-08T16:14:55Z |
Dylanlip |
Fixing category error.
|
| 1833493 |
2009-04-08T16:13:45Z |
Dylanlip |
Adding template for (possible) major use in the future.
|
