oldid date/time username edit summary
4000119 2021-10-31T21:37:45Z EthanGaming7640
2505232 2013-03-24T20:07:55Z Darklama simplified wording
2505221 2013-03-24T17:43:13Z Darklama grammar tense, tone, and links
2503537 2013-03-19T18:35:45Z Darklama wording
2299403 2012-04-03T15:48:23Z Darklama briefer, and mention never assume
2066823 2011-03-06T16:59:14Z Darklama what AGF means was a bit repetitive too, condensed into one paragraph
2066790 2011-03-06T14:24:46Z Belteshazzar
2066789 2011-03-06T14:20:35Z Belteshazzar
2062791 2011-03-03T23:45:17Z Belteshazzar
2062790 2011-03-03T23:36:09Z Belteshazzar "when possible" was a bit repetitive, meaning is clear
2062789 2011-03-03T23:33:13Z Belteshazzar
2061840 2011-03-01T21:32:18Z Belteshazzar
2061839 2011-03-01T21:30:25Z Belteshazzar
2061361 2011-03-01T01:30:13Z Belteshazzar
2060943 2011-02-28T06:03:50Z Belteshazzar
2060942 2011-02-28T05:55:32Z Belteshazzar
2060888 2011-02-28T03:34:09Z Belteshazzar
2060886 2011-02-28T03:32:40Z Belteshazzar
2060881 2011-02-28T03:01:11Z Belteshazzar Restoring previous wording regarding blocks
2060879 2011-02-28T02:55:52Z Belteshazzar Once again, two different ideas were being conflated
2060877 2011-02-28T02:47:03Z Belteshazzar Some people might not understand "block"
2052647 2011-02-21T20:36:37Z Belteshazzar
2019938 2011-01-20T17:15:37Z Darklama previous changes were difficult for me to follow, tried to fix grammar problems and make it more coherent
2019931 2011-01-20T16:29:56Z Panic2k4
2019930 2011-01-20T16:26:23Z Panic2k4
2019929 2011-01-20T16:25:33Z Panic2k4 probably needs a better rewording
2019925 2011-01-20T16:15:18Z Panic2k4 removed block from the text (that is only one of the possible outcomes), clearly stated that users can act to make actions clearer and provided information on how to do that and presume vs assume
2019923 2011-01-20T16:13:31Z Panic2k4
2019910 2011-01-20T15:31:57Z Darklama missing word
2019901 2011-01-20T15:00:47Z Darklama a bit more toning, and bring us full circle
2019877 2011-01-20T13:34:29Z Darklama tone it down a bit more
2019601 2011-01-19T18:25:37Z Belteshazzar Per concerns about tone
2019327 2011-01-18T22:34:39Z Belteshazzar Restoring more practical characterizations, see talk
2018276 2011-01-16T17:27:10Z Darklama parts needed to assume good faith itself, yes I realize the irony
2018255 2011-01-16T16:48:01Z Belteshazzar Better flow
2017984 2011-01-15T16:35:30Z Belteshazzar
2017982 2011-01-15T16:31:18Z Belteshazzar There should be some explanation here of what we mean by "accidents and experiments"
2015868 2011-01-12T03:20:12Z Darklama focused paragraph more
2015860 2011-01-12T03:04:29Z Belteshazzar Trying to make this paragraph more focused; possibly another paragraph could be made about more general mistakes
2015731 2011-01-11T21:18:30Z Darklama prune to make a bit simpler
2015711 2011-01-11T20:13:53Z Belteshazzar A bit simpler
2014473 2011-01-08T19:57:47Z Belteshazzar Italics seem to be a bit overused on this page
2014339 2011-01-08T16:06:29Z Belteshazzar
2014336 2011-01-08T15:56:16Z Belteshazzar
2014333 2011-01-08T15:51:18Z Belteshazzar Once again, multiple ideas were conflated here, and context was lacking
2014323 2011-01-08T15:14:03Z Belteshazzar Paragraph conflated two different points
2014322 2011-01-08T15:09:48Z Belteshazzar simpler
2014317 2011-01-08T14:58:38Z Belteshazzar Better word, since this refers to how someone feels
2010690 2011-01-01T13:39:33Z Darklama /* Examples */ +1
2010687 2011-01-01T13:21:02Z Darklama towards treatment rather
2010686 2011-01-01T13:15:18Z Darklama saw opportunities to merge a few concepts together and move this forwards treatment rather than how to think
2010644 2011-01-01T06:10:09Z Belteshazzar Division is no longer needed or helpful
2010643 2011-01-01T06:06:57Z Belteshazzar /* Practical Application */
2010418 2010-12-31T15:26:21Z Belteshazzar /* Practical Application */
2010413 2010-12-31T15:13:57Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
2008962 2010-12-27T13:46:18Z Darklama merged two paragraphs on the same thing, state do's before do not's, and get more to the point
2008875 2010-12-27T08:52:04Z Belteshazzar Paragraph did not flow logically, and was conflating two different points. Emphasizing AAGF; point about perspectives vs. community norms might better fit at [[WB:BITE]] or elsewhere
2008873 2010-12-27T08:19:57Z Belteshazzar Re-dividing sections merged on 16:32, 11 November 2010, though I would favor removing most of "Correcting mistakes"
2008864 2010-12-27T07:37:36Z Belteshazzar Moving and editing sentence
2008861 2010-12-27T07:20:24Z Belteshazzar
2008860 2010-12-27T07:09:58Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
2008608 2010-12-26T16:54:59Z Belteshazzar /* Practical Application */ comma
2008605 2010-12-26T16:46:42Z Belteshazzar "accept" and "information" would seem to imply that something is actually true
2007844 2010-12-23T15:56:54Z Darklama /* Practical Application */ problems -> address concerns, flows nicely into next part
2007842 2010-12-23T15:52:36Z Darklama looks good, saw a few more ways to simplify
2007794 2010-12-23T11:12:51Z Belteshazzar /* Practical Application */
2007793 2010-12-23T11:11:20Z Belteshazzar /* Practical Application */ grammar
2007792 2010-12-23T11:03:15Z Belteshazzar /* Practical Application */
2007788 2010-12-23T10:57:33Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
2007785 2010-12-23T10:51:10Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */ comma
2007784 2010-12-23T10:47:18Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
2007782 2010-12-23T10:45:27Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */ Actually, this seems a bit awkward and ambiguous
2007781 2010-12-23T10:41:08Z Belteshazzar
2007780 2010-12-23T10:32:47Z Belteshazzar /* Practical Application */
2007775 2010-12-23T10:10:52Z Belteshazzar /* Practical Application */
2007755 2010-12-23T09:29:57Z Belteshazzar /* Practical Application */ As far as I know, dropping the assumption of good faith is not a formal process
2007753 2010-12-23T09:17:21Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
2007750 2010-12-23T07:39:30Z Belteshazzar /* Practical Application */ shortening paragraph to be more to the point
2007743 2010-12-23T06:22:05Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
2007742 2010-12-23T06:01:24Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
2007737 2010-12-23T05:46:55Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
2007734 2010-12-23T05:24:05Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
2007717 2010-12-23T02:18:35Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
2006002 2010-12-19T00:19:46Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
2005994 2010-12-18T23:18:35Z Darklama particularly when their actions are baffling
2005993 2010-12-18T23:01:44Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
2004998 2010-12-16T23:31:49Z Darklama /* Assume Good Faith */ +when
2004995 2010-12-16T23:27:54Z Darklama /* Assume Good Faith */ acceptance, be polite, whether you agree or not, constructive criticism
2004980 2010-12-16T22:55:13Z Belteshazzar sp
2004978 2010-12-16T22:53:40Z Belteshazzar Expanding on AAGF comments, moving to end
2004964 2010-12-16T22:30:48Z Belteshazzar /* Practical Application */
2004959 2010-12-16T22:12:48Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
2004957 2010-12-16T22:06:41Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
2004953 2010-12-16T22:01:26Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
2001361 2010-12-16T05:30:00Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
2001360 2010-12-16T05:23:31Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
2001359 2010-12-16T05:16:22Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
2001357 2010-12-16T04:59:33Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
1991726 2010-12-04T23:17:12Z Adrignola nav template replacing links
1981672 2010-11-28T12:12:50Z Darklama /* Assume Good Faith */
1981663 2010-11-28T11:55:47Z Darklama /* Assume Good Faith */ minor changes to fix some awkwardness that remains to be clearer
1981660 2010-11-28T11:35:06Z Darklama /* Assume Good Faith */
1981659 2010-11-28T11:33:13Z Darklama /* Assume Good Faith */ of -> over
1981657 2010-11-28T11:24:33Z Darklama /* Assume Good Faith */ rewrote: This fundamental principle allows Wikibooks and you to work more effectively with minimal fuss
1981656 2010-11-28T11:22:37Z Darklama /* Assume Good Faith */ or vice versa, got it backwards
1981652 2010-11-28T11:20:05Z Darklama /* Assume Good Faith */ +or versa vice
1981650 2010-11-28T11:16:58Z Darklama /* Assume Good Faith */ hopefully gets the [[w:Norm of reciprocity]] idea across better now
1981636 2010-11-28T10:11:06Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
1981566 2010-11-28T05:45:37Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
1981403 2010-11-28T01:55:39Z Darklama /* Practical Application */ gr, link
1981374 2010-11-28T01:03:05Z Darklama made a bit more homogeneous (edit conflict: tried to include some differences I noticed)
1981346 2010-11-28T00:26:32Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
1981337 2010-11-28T00:14:45Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
1981334 2010-11-28T00:13:05Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
1981316 2010-11-27T23:29:02Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */
1981298 2010-11-27T22:40:12Z Darklama /* Assume Good Faith */ neutral tone
1981279 2010-11-27T21:56:46Z Belteshazzar /* Assume Good Faith */ Condensing and trying to make flow more logical
1970771 2010-11-12T13:16:38Z Belteshazzar Flow had become quite illogical, trying to emphasize important points
1970314 2010-11-11T16:41:11Z Darklama /* Practical Application */ Here are some examples of how to address common concerns
1970308 2010-11-11T16:32:27Z Darklama merge correcting mistakes and practical application sections, keeping examples
1970267 2010-11-11T15:20:14Z Darklama /* Correcting mistakes */ +People who mean well will sometimes make mistakes
1970263 2010-11-11T15:15:33Z Darklama more neutral/positive wording
1970225 2010-11-11T12:53:48Z Belteshazzar /* Practical Application */
1970220 2010-11-11T12:34:50Z Belteshazzar /* Practical Application */ Not needed, the point is that you should do this as much as possible in any case
1970219 2010-11-11T12:31:23Z Belteshazzar /* Practical Application */ not really needed
1970217 2010-11-11T12:28:18Z Belteshazzar /* Practical Application */
1970216 2010-11-11T12:26:18Z Belteshazzar /* Practical Application */ Moving sentence
1970215 2010-11-11T12:22:56Z Belteshazzar /* Practical Application */
1970202 2010-11-11T11:16:02Z Belteshazzar Language about "bad faith" seemed too problematic
1970197 2010-11-11T10:40:39Z Belteshazzar /* Bad Faith */ Linking to Wikipedia essay cautioning against over-citing AGF
1970196 2010-11-11T10:35:53Z Belteshazzar /* Bad Faith */
1969917 2010-11-10T15:11:56Z Darklama /* Bad Faith */ define bad faith, and changes reflecting that
1969912 2010-11-10T14:36:59Z Darklama /* Correcting mistakes */ more of keeping it simple
1969755 2010-11-10T11:09:22Z Belteshazzar /* Correcting mistakes */ Shortening verbiage
1911457 2010-08-15T12:58:02Z Darklama /* Assume Good Faith */ less bad more neutral/positive tone
1911277 2010-08-15T02:27:11Z Panic2k4 /* See also */ this is a policy does relate to this page text
1911253 2010-08-15T01:07:59Z Belteshazzar
1911252 2010-08-15T01:01:14Z Belteshazzar /* Correcting mistakes */ Rephrasing, removing unnecessary clauses; I don't see how reverting mistakes is a bad thing, it just needs to be clearly and patiently explained
1908779 2010-08-09T15:52:56Z Adrignola Protected "[[Wikibooks:Assume good faith]]": High-impact page ([edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) [move=sysop] (indefinite))
1831726 2010-06-08T12:52:43Z Adrignola fixed shortcuts
1828638 2010-06-07T18:13:43Z Adrignola fixed shortcut
1654018 2009-11-09T07:53:27Z 87.106.79.175 /* Correcting mistakes */
1613718 2009-08-21T15:49:27Z Adrignola /* Correcting mistakes */ Fixed link
1577293 2009-07-23T03:15:44Z Adrignola Fixed template call
1260951 2008-08-28T17:53:18Z Erkan Yilmaz +s -do replace dict.cc with [[Wikipedia:Dictionary#Major_English_dictionaries]] e -> i ; I am not sure if there should be mentioned especially bad faith ?
1260920 2008-08-28T17:02:10Z Darklama major rewording, reordering, whatever to try to make this a better proposal
1260692 2008-08-28T13:50:31Z 84.21.34.140 /* Assume Good Faith */
1147223 2008-03-26T01:59:22Z Mike.lifeguard /* Intro */ split off shortcuts
957258 2007-09-03T17:09:26Z Panic2k4 moved bit about what is not covered to the end of summary and simplified wording.
956415 2007-09-02T05:55:56Z Weblum Delete duplicated word
893816 2007-06-12T03:41:32Z 220.239.102.94 /* Correcting errors */
883252 2007-05-31T13:08:08Z 196.0.7.96 /* Bad Faith */
883250 2007-05-31T13:04:47Z 196.0.7.96 correct grammar: who/whom
831092 2007-04-15T03:54:27Z Panic2k4 /* Correcting errors */
831089 2007-04-15T03:52:44Z Panic2k4
831087 2007-04-15T03:46:57Z Panic2k4 /* Related policies */
831086 2007-04-15T03:45:13Z Panic2k4 /* Bad Faith */
831082 2007-04-15T03:42:16Z Panic2k4 /* Bad Faith */
831081 2007-04-15T03:41:55Z Panic2k4 /* Assume Good Faith */
831080 2007-04-15T03:40:29Z Panic2k4 /* Assume Good Faith */
831078 2007-04-15T03:39:40Z Mattb112885 changed around some stuff, made reference to other, related policies.
831077 2007-04-15T03:39:22Z Panic2k4 attempting to merge the two versions
831066 2007-04-15T03:32:49Z Panic2k4 /* Assume Good Faith */
809554 2007-03-28T00:41:22Z Darklama adopted some good ideas from the alternative branch of this proposal.
807002 2007-03-25T23:35:31Z Panic2k4 /* Intentions, not actions */
807001 2007-03-25T23:34:07Z Panic2k4 /* Assume Good Faith */ simplification and generalization
777092 2007-03-07T02:14:42Z Darklama some clean up and minor changes in wording
774707 2007-03-05T03:55:59Z Xixtas
774534 2007-03-05T00:02:55Z Whiteknight /* Related policies */ removed link to rejected policy, replaced with link to [[Wikibooks:Profanity]]
626090 2006-10-26T14:24:00Z DavidCary move to some other wikibook
343964 2006-01-23T03:16:13Z Kernigh trying to [[Wiktionary:port|port]] this policy from Wikipedia to Wikibooks, though now it is long, and probably needs further fixes
343846 2006-01-22T23:36:07Z Kernigh attributing page to Wikipedia; removing block of unnecessary red links
293698 2005-11-28T22:40:22Z Lord Voldemort~enwikibooks Start of proposed guideline page